“Don’t let the world around you squeeze you into its own mould, but let God re-mould your minds from within...”
Romans 12:2

No one logged in. Log in

Hilary's Desk

Challenge dechallenge rechallenge

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Ever heard of something called “challenge”, “dechallenge” … “rechallenge” (CDR)? It goes like this. Give a person like me, antibiotics (challenge), and the body happens to go nuts. Big rash (urticaria). But as a doc you aren’t sure, so you stop the drug for a while (dechallenge), and then give it again (rechallenge). Result = Big rash, face and neck swells and I can't breath. The rechallenge proved that the antibiotic was causing the reaction. The same principle applies to all drugs, foods, whatever. It could be called “immunology 101” Real basic. Or you would think, right?  Continue Reading


Part Eight Gardasil and Mark Probert

Hilary Butler - Sunday, January 10, 2010

Yes, Mark we were waiting for the first utterance from vaccine defenders.   Continue Reading


Part Seven Gardasil and the Harper

Hilary Butler - Saturday, January 09, 2010

In October 2009, Dr Diana Harper, the lead researcher in the development of both Gardasil and Cervarix, addressed a conference intended to promote vaccines . (Just in case it disappears, I've pdf'd it here.)  Instead, the data she presented, left the doctors in the audience, wondering why HPV vaccines were used in developed countries at all.  Continue Reading


Part Six Some more of the iceberg

Hilary Butler - Saturday, January 09, 2010

Jasmine is not alone. But her mother is the first who has decided to go public with all her information.  Continue Reading


Part Five Jasmine, the tip of the iceberg

Hilary Butler - Friday, January 08, 2010

What follows is a letter to Dr Stewart Jessamine which gives a overview of the issues as they stand today:  Continue Reading


Part Four Autopsy and Jasmine Renata

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Rhonda’s focus turned to the question of “why did Gardasil do this and how?”. In reviewing Jasmine’s medical records and all the talks Rhonda and I had, I was most concerned at certain aspects of Jasmine’s last few months, in particular the deterioration of her ability to make decisions, and to work out how to do simple jobs which she had done since childhood. It seemed too me that apart from the other symptoms in Jasmine’s body, there was something going on in her brain.  Continue Reading


Part Two Reporting the Reaction

Hilary Butler - Tuesday, January 05, 2010

There are two possible scenarios here. Your doctor reports the reaction, but as an afterthought, you ask for a copy of that report. Sitting there, reading it, you are staggered. This report sounds like a completely different reaction to the one your child suffered! After all, local reaction and pain at injection site, just doesn’t come anywhere near what you are seeing in front of your eyes.  Continue Reading


Part Three Carm and Jasmine Renata

Hilary Butler - Monday, January 04, 2010

In October 2009, Rhonda Renata emailed me about the death of her daughter Jasmine on 22nd September 2009. She had emailed John Key, Tony Ryall, and a few others and had got the usual fluff political responses from a dogma-ingrained system. From the time of Jasmine’s death, she had scoured the internet and found many cases of Gardasil recipients who had had similar stories to Jasmine. She wanted answers as to her daughter’s death, and wanted to know what to do next.  Continue Reading


Part One When your child has a vaccine reaction

Hilary Butler - Monday, January 04, 2010

How would you feel if your healthy child died, or had a serious reaction to Gardasil? What would you expect to happen in terms of your concerns, and your “need-to-know”? How would you go about finding closure? What are the obstacles along this way?  Continue Reading


Part 4 of 4 Offiteerers beliefs

Hilary Butler - Sunday, November 29, 2009

WE mothers are not the crème de la crème of society. WE did not go to medical school. WE are mere mothers, who can’t possibly understand all medical science. And WE know this, because they infer so, in their medical articles about us. And in lay-press articles, we hear patronising messages such as vaccines being just like “hard hats”, “seat belts” and “steel-capped boots”. Strange. NONE of those things go ‘into’ a body. Neither do they have potential to train-wreck the immune system in a finely tuned biological-wonder.  Continue Reading