On 14th January 2010, the WHO put out a press release stating that they had not changed the definition of pandemic mid-way through the Swine flu, in order to ramp up sales of an unnecessary vaccine for a virus which did not fit their previous definition of the word "pandemic". Their porky comes after a European governing body announced a formal investigation of WHO for consistently scaremongering H1N1 into something dangerous, when it is not even as bad as normal flu, and...according to them... doing it because WHO experts have their hands in the "pharma tills" big time.
Yesterday, the Sunday Star Times published an article yesterday, ramping everyone up about a “next” wave of Swine Flu, to yet again frighten the gullible into accepting a new trivalent flu shot which has H1N1 in it. Nothing like having a captive audience, huh? So if you "want" the ordinary flu vaccine, the Swine flu is embedded in it as well. Have their been any studies looking at the safety of this particular combination? After all, Switzerland has put out a warning that Novartis's H1N1 vaccine could be dangerous for the autoimmune. Have any studies been done in that regard on the New Zealand vaccine? No? I thought not.
I thought readers here might like to know that the World Health Organisation did change the definition of "pandemic" in the middle of the Swine Flu outbreak, to suit themselves, and good old Google cache provided the proof. (Psst... Is the head of WHO internet literate?)
These two documents were sourced and provided by Dr Tom Jefferson, and Dr Peter Doshi. (Half way down the page on Dr Jefferson's website)
This is the WHO website on 1 May 2009 (Google cache pdf).
This is the WHO website on Sept 2, 2009 (Google cache pdf).
So, the question that needs to be asked is:
If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word "pandemic" in order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even bigger profits, and WHO does too, what else are they lying about?