Hurrah, a doctor finally sees the blindingly obvious! In a study entitled “Wait to clamp umbilical cord, study says” Paul R. Sanberg from South Florida College of Medicine, is the first person I know of, who has finally published what I’ve been saying for years. Which equates to “Don't clamp the newborn’s umbilical cord!” His reason is that cord blood gives the baby its first infusion of stem cells which could help regenerate any underdeveloped organs. And do a whole heap of other things too. I’m glad he said that. But here’s my problem. Why didn’t all these medical people who have called cord blood “medical waste” and set up cord banks specifically to save those stem cells, see that? Isn’t it somewhat blindingly obvious? My first published article on delaying cord clamping was in the New Zealand Home Birth Magazine which was then reproduced in the New Zealand Association of Midwives Newsletter. An American magazine called “Mothering” published it in 1986. 24 years ago. My second “rant” on this topic was last year, as part of a talk. Read Full Blog
Hilary's Desk
Recent Posts
Archive
Tag Cloud
data scupturing Influenza vaccine infectious disease manipulation HPV, human papillomaviruses brainwashing misinformation influenza Gardasil convictions conspiracy informed choice swine flu: bird flu compliance unvaccinated propaganda vaccine reactions paediatricians conform bullying control corruption democracy marketing medical history dogma control adverse reactions obstetrics medical system lies Dr Offit coercion nutrition immune system immunisation denial Department of Health criminally negligent Vested Interests death MoH mind manipulation Public Health ignorance stupidity side effects advertising choice Merck

